Board Thread:Dark Souls III/@comment-28433018-20160511085122/@comment-28391607-20160513121036

Hmmmm, I love the concept of the "No soul". I suppose to counter argue, just for the sake of you being able to cement your idea, I would think that a soulless being wouldn't be able to interact with others (through dialogue, strategy in fighting, purchasing of equipment, making decisions on upgrades, being summoned to another world/timeline, etc.) very much like our character can do. Also, each and every boss/enemy we kill in the game releases their soul(s) upon their death (including bosses and enemies) suggesting to me that once a soul is lost, the host is gone forever (not necessarily the case of our hero.

2) "the flame has weakened". I love this idea. Major thumbs up. I thought there was a link the fire ending in DS 3 though. Perhaps im wrong.

3) "fire extension". Now would you count the many times a LoC extended the flame through sacrifice a matter of extending the fire?

4) "Unkindled". I agree that unkindled doesn't necessarily mean hollow, but I don't know that it is only in reference to one who "hasn't" linked the fire. Afterall, Anri is attempting to get the LoC's presumably with the same intention we have. I personally think unkindled means we are the "Chosen One" for this particular timeline; as Yhorm was the unkindled in his timeline where he linked the flame, and Ludleth of Courland at one point, and so on.

5) "Usurption of fire" Man I love this idea. Matter of fact, Im on par with you 100% with this idea.

I hope this was helpful with enough critique to help you whichever way you can use my opinion for. I love the initiative and the thoughts man.