User blog comment:Cosmicsilver/State of the Wiki/@comment-3492791-20141021004138/@comment-5632187-20141021010525

More Admins would be nice, that's for certain. As of right now, though, only a couple people really resonate with me as suitable candidates.

To expand on the unanimous backing thing, the way I crafted these rules was to fit how I currently see it working with the staff in place. Right now, there are 11 people who are considered "Staff" when we include Chat Moderators. I know that all other 10 staff members would be reasonable and cooperative in these discussions, and if there really was any dissent, it would be due to very good reasoning. However, this is pretty shoddy reasoning if I'm being honest. The dissent would obviously have to be due to legitimate reasons, and if it was something as menial as "I don't like this users avatar" or something similar to that, the dissent would not be taken seriously.

Fair enough with the discussions, but it should be understood that if there is no response to suggestions I give, I will assume no one has any input on it and that's what we'll have to go with. It's not what I want to do, but at the end of the day, threads can't stay open forever. So yeah, that's pretty much all I have to say about the Wiki Discussion Board.

And finally, I would love to make the Manuals of Style a community project, I could see great things coming out of that. I think having basic guides available is one of the best things a Wiki can do to make it open to newcomers to the Wiki. As of right now, the Manuals of Style aren't very useful, like I already said. I think this would best be saved for until after we finish all of our discussions about various topics for the Wiki which could directly impact the Manuals of Style.