Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-5264386-20140810061848/@comment-25173123-20140816082816

Legendary Bloatfly wrote:

Also, no one is talking down to you. We are having a discussion, and in discussions, opinions will clash. It's inevitable. So please, don't make empty threats to anyone.

Read again... I said "talked down" not "talked down to" Meaning he is attempting to make my words as having no valid input into the discussion. And presenting that I should no longer voice an opinion if he does not favor the method in which I present it.

And where is the empty threat? There was zero threat presented in my reply.

As for the vote thing. Nothing has been determined on how the vote will actually go down. My opinion was voiced that any votes if done need to at least be ultimately weighed by already in place Administration and they be ultimate deciders in the matter. This is far from the democratic vote system that some others have pointed towards.

And again... if it goes down the community consensus route and not the administrative control route then no you likely won't be able to simply fix things later. As the community can easily manipulate a change to force out opinions that are not to their liking. (administrative control needs to still have a priority with any policy put in place.)

I am not against a voting system. I am against the thought of allowing community rule without any checks and balance in place to ensure we do not feed upon those with differing opinion.