Thread:Balagog gro-Nolob/@comment-667748-20130427150023/@comment-667748-20130506100649

It is something I have put though on.

My short answer is that yes, it would be possible. However, to be able to do this, the template would require more ownership of its rows, which would require fields like "row1name=" etc...

From a template writing point of view, there is no problem whatsoever (it would massively increase code size, but that is not a real problem). However, from a template usage point of view, all the extra fields would end up making things more complicated and less versatile.

I have tested variants, but at the end of the day, I think a little bit of extra input is worth it to keep the template syntax simpler.

That's my stance anyways.