Talk:Manus, Father of the Abyss/@comment-71.204.137.193-20130629085511/@comment-6003396-20130630054427

I think I read it just fine. Did you read my entire post? I went on to address the entire argument.

I think this thread is getting to be too long, as your last comment doesn't seem to be displaying properly (at least to me). had to retrieve it from here

''XtremeVoidNinja wrote: OK, here is it dumby down:

Royal Woods is DarkRoot Garden according to you. Royal Woods is infected with the Abyss 300 years Ago. DarkRoot Garden is clear of the Abyss present Day. This means that either the two areas are not the same location or the Abyss goes away ''

I understood the entire argument, no need to "dumby down".

Arguments tend to work like this: in order for one to be validated, all conflicting arguments need to be proven wrong.

The counter argument I presented was that after "swallowing" Oolacile (as stated in Elizabeth's dialogue.) the Chasm of the Abyss closes in the Royal Wood leaving no traces of the Abyss anywhere above ground by the time of the Chosen Undead.

Until the above counter argument is proven wrong, the argument of additional sources of the Abyss is not validated.

The argument that Kaathe was the original source of the Abyss has, I think, been disproven. As Manus is stated to be the "Father" of it numerous times over (as well as being ancient).

The argument that Kaathe somehow inherits the ability to create a new source of the Abyss and/or prolong the Abyss, has been neither proven nor disproven. However, I think it highly unlikely, as I can not fathom a way for this to be true without inventing something entirely speculative. But that is my opinion.