Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-5632187-20141023222048/@comment-25173123-20141024075459

And this is the crap being dealt with. A person reverts info I just put up until he himself proves it. And now though I have tested it myself it has to be considered invalid until proven again?

http://darksouls.wikia.com/wiki/Reah_of_Thorolund?s=wl#WikiaArticleComments

http://darksouls.wikia.com/index.php?title=Reah_of_Thorolund&diff=179662&oldid=179658

Why does the info get removed and then after revision, discussion on it then done? Why would it not be the fact he would question the validity of it and wait for a reply before taking it upon himself to determine it was incorrect because he had not dealt with it before and remove it?

If he wants to reword it then no issue. But why is it being removed when it has already been tested? What makes his thoughts of quote "I've come up with a theory about this." then dictate it has to be removed until he proves or disproves his theory??

I think clarifying steps to be taken before the "undo" button is hit is more appropriate a discussion. As that is the true source of the issue.

As it is now I would have to remember any edits I did previously that were undone and monitor progress on it. And it could completely go off my radar. Where if he had left it I could see if any edits are made to it later due to an e-mail coming my way. Why am I forced to be treated as guilty of bad editing due to a theory or thought that it might be another factor at play? (in this case specifically)

So do we wait for him now to test his theory (which I had replied was already tested in my run through) before it is added back in?

Basically if he had a theory on why something was occurring then he can go and test it without any qualms from others on what he is doing. And then come back and make a counter to info presented. But you can't undo something because you might have a theory as to what else might be going on.

I have undone some of my own edits after proving myself to be viewing a glitch or other circumstance instead but never have I undone another persons edits because I thought possibly another theory might be in play.

If material added is not speculation and occurred in game to them then treat it as discovered unless immediate denial of factual evidence is presented against it.

This entire process is already annoying the crap out of me. As if someone was testing the waters with the "undo" knowing I couldn't revert it back. Bullcrap.