Thread:Matsczon/@comment-32745741-20181212183206/@comment-4511886-20181213200522

1) The idea of the Light, Dark, Death and Life Souls is a pretty logical and widely accepted theory, but I will agree that, aside from the Dark Soul, none of it is canon.

2) Most of the lore on the wiki is based on the English translation, as that is what is available to most of us. If you can provide proper reference to this Japanese lore that would be great, as simply saying "It's a mistranslation" is not argument enough to prove that "grandfather" is wrong and "founder" is right.

3) I can't find anything in that citation that implies the firesage was not a fire sorcerer. Whether he or ceaseless was the first demon is ultimately irrelevant to the topic of sorcery. If you think that it being mistranslated discredits the entire description, then all I can say is that I find that completely unreasonable.

4) I don't actually remember ever seeing any lore that claims Seath's blindness and research had any relation. I recall him going insane from his research, but I do not know about him going blind because of it. Regardless, a source would be great, once again.

5) I don't see the point you're trying to make here, as neither of us made any significant change to that paragraph. Regardless, the description pretty clearly tries to imply that the Old Moonlight was created after the First Flame since dragons didn't use swords as far as we know, which would make it pretty hard for a sword to be in Midir's memory before the First Flame came about. That said, I feel it is more a reference to King's Field than anything, although that does not mean it should not be considered as canon.