Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-5264386-20140810061848/@comment-25173123-20140811204530

We aren't talking all the decisions cosmic. The conversation is on assigning new admin and moderators. (i.e. promotions)

I am just saying they ultimately will need to weigh all the information and make a decision. Because democracy is not feasible for a websight in most cases.

You are now saying there is an opportunity to make a vote in opposition? And yet you mention not having a voice in others persons vote? Then what is an opposition vote to you? Simply voting for someone different? I was not referring to discussion and debate on a persons particular vote but being able to address your own reasoning why nominated person would not be a good person for said position is a valid option to have. Otherwise you would only have the reasons for having a person in position but never have a reason not to have them in a position. So you obviously misunderstood what I originally stated?

So again... we aren't talking about decisions in general... we are talking about promotions. I already addressed that I was not commenting on general decisions making at all because that should be handled totally separate of promotions and we have a forum for that already I believe? As others have mentioned.

I know I type a lot and you might not read it all but at least know what I am not talking about first? If you don't understand me then simply say... Ho I have no clue what you are saying. Simple. :D