Thread:Kouzen/@comment-4511886-20190811075830/@comment-5633574-20190811213200

If you truly want to split hairs, I did recently undo a somewhat vandalism edit of the Nito page where somebody removed all punctuation. But for a better answer, I have not been inactive - even if not logged in I have kept a close eye on the wiki itself, especially any entries about lore or additions of lore. This is due to the fact that last time I actually made significant edits it was because Den Éna Faskómilos decided to go across a bunch of lore pages, if not outright creating ones, passing off speculation as fact and filling them with utter nonsense while also passing his own headcanons and bizarre ideas - not to mention a complete lack of neutral tone.

I bring that up because I've been watching articles to make sure it doesn't happen again, considering nobody at all was willing to fix those before me. So when Pihoihoi filled them all with poorly written, poorly formatted lore that had several incorrect or theoretical parts, I just saw more of them with no actual fixes to it after they were made. I would've gladly elaborated on the edit summaries in more detail but they did have a character limit.

So I suppose to elaborate, even with fixing all of the grammar and formatting issues, several of the lore on the page had no business being there or was just redundant to what was already written. Not to mention one page, the New Londo one I think it was, Pihoihoi actually outright removed the description and made of a mess of it because he thought it belonged elsewhere. Perhaps the best example of how bad it was that I can immediately recall is the DS3 Anor Londo page - there was a bunch of unrelated lore included on it, which if it had to be on a location page, should've been on the DS1 Anor Londo page. There were falsehoods on it (Some mentions of the Dancer and Vordt randomly being very close), and overall it just did not look good. As a whole, they did not meet the quality standards.

If my removing of them spurring people on to actively fix them up and put proper entries as opposed to what were there prior, versus just leaving them as they were, then I see no issue with having removed them until they were in a better state. So long as people don't fill them with speculation or falsehoods then there would be no need for me to touch them again either.