Board Thread:Dark Souls II/@comment-24494913-20140319193521/@comment-10209824-20140510011146

It's one thing to discuss what's right and what's wrong and totally different thing to argue from a point that has been proven incorrect. We have the developers of the game saying that it's not Lordran, so when people keep saying it is, there is really no basis for it. As for whether or not it's Vinheim, someone literally suggested to me that it might be Zena, backed it up with fairly good proof, and I said that it's totally possible that it is Zena instead of Vinheim. So I am completely open to being wrong. It being Vinheim is my theory.

As for my arguments that have supposedly been defeated. How? Show me one good one? So far I have one guy who only says that I'm wrong and never backs it up or gives his own theories and then I have a whole bunch of different people who come up with theories that require me to look up to see if past and current lore/evidence and supports it. If it does not, then I refute it. If it does, then we discuss it. I've actually been really consistent on that. Also I'm not sure how you can tell if I'm 'screaming' considering that text doesn't really have volume.