Thread:Zelron/@comment-25173123-20140726031921/@comment-25173123-20140726061450

What is unproven about the fact that added strength increases damage while two handed?

The description specifically states "Strength is also a weapon damage modifier, increasing damage output for weapons that scale with strength." thus the fact that 2 handed wielding increases weapons damage based on strength is obvious, especially when noting the increase in damage as you play using 2 handed style.

But to prove that strength also effects 2 handed weapon holding damage it seemed easy enough. I just went into game and farmed some points to level up. I checked my current weapon strength of my strength leveling weapon the Black Knight Sword (note I used a high strength modification weapon to eliminate any small variances that might not show as much/or any variance) and it showed strength of 427 one handed and 474 2 handed. I then go into the leveling screen and target a strength stat increase from 23 to 24. It shows 431 one handed and 483 2 handed.

So strength effectively in this case increased this weapon by 4 while one handed and increased by 9 while 2 handed. Thus proving the fact strength does effect damage stat of 2 handed wielding. If it was not effected then a straight across the board increment change would be seen. And you could then assume 2 handed welding was a simple damage modifier based on solely other reference.

So if you want to reword my page edit then I have no issue... but the comments by both Admin already referenced what I just identified with my testing of the issue. And your deleting the edit simply because you had no knowledge on that area was in error.

This is specifically why talking with others before removing their edits is a more social approach to an open editing scheme.

As for placing myself below others, well that is not the case. I simply identify that others have more responsibilities in their moderation and thus are given Administrative functions. And removing an edit simply based off of personal thought on a subject with no communication with editor on their change prior is more an Administrative function in my eyes.

Simply try and communicate with others before willful deleting on opinionated items maybe?

And again, I am not trying to be combative or anything. Just trying to get information and give information that might assist newbie players like myself. I only even deal with pages for the most part that coincide with my current play experience as I move along. As strength page did because I was leveling at the time and trying to see the effects on damage and such. And only noticed the 2 handed info in the comments with nothing pertaining to damage 2 handed in the notes. Felt it was relevant to add it's information in an area for newbies and all to find.

I would never remove anything that I disagreed with on this Wikia before talking with the person that made the edit and worked through the issue. I might talk someone to death on the subject but I definitely wouldn't dictate a change because I thought my point might be more valid at the time.

Some people shoot first and ask questions later, others shoot first and care not to ask any questions later, and others still just ask questions and allow others to shoot themselves. :D

Still just playing a game and trying to give and get info. Seems like you are not looking at the same thing as me? Oh well... I'll watch out for your bloodstains in game. ;)