Thread:Fingyer/@comment-25173123-20140927090142

We recently had a nice constructive forum discussion on the information placed on the Binoculars page, as I hope you recall?

And though we had some differences of opinion a few changes were made and I believe we came to an agreed upon compromise with how to display the information and what portions should be removed and what would stay.

You even made the final wording to the information.

After all the discussion that we did on the page another editor came in and changed the information to wording that did not fit with what we discussed. I changed it back as the wording had false information in it about the bow. It was then changed again by editor with bow information taken out but basically just changing the note to a simple 1st person to 3rd person reference. (which still was not totally acurate nor got the point across that using Binoculars is the only way to remove character from screen.) He was not willing to discus how to better word the information but only insisted he be the one to word it.

I refer him to the forum discussion and he proceeds to post on it that the information was not important so he was going to delete in anyways. He also mentions possibly another way remove character from screen but does not specify how to do so. I am assuming he might be referring to simply trying to hide the character behind other object, or something to that effect? (which is hardly the same as what can be achieved with binoculars. And is not removing character from screen but just momentarily obstructing it from view) But I don't know because he won't share the information and simply deleted what we worked on.

The undo train on the page is getting out of hand an an Admin might need to step in?

I don't feel that the process of talking on the forum to get concensus on a subject is working when someone later comes in and says they don't care and undid everything we discussed. A waring or something really should be presented to curb the actions of this editor. He does a lot of good editting work but that shouldn't allow him to get away with the "my way or the hi-way" mentality.  