Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-5632187-20141023222048/@comment-5632187-20141024195402

I'm getting the feeling that the entire point of this post was missed.

The entire point of the Wiki Discussion Board is to draft, discuss, and create policies and guidelines. This was a draft so that the discussion to follow could have some talking points for users to discuss. I'm not saying these are what the rules will become, I'm not saying that you(as in the Wiki members collectively) have no say in the matter, I'm saying that this is a topic that we need to craft guidelines for. Do we seriously have to make a separate discussion listing all the topics that need to be discussed? That's pretty redundant, if you ask me. Topics will be brought up as users think of them, and they will be discussed as users talk about them.

Moving on to the actual discussion at hand, this is the reason that we have these posts, so users can point out what they believe is wrong and what they think is good. Billy, you seem pretty opposed to the entire post I've made, but you've not offered any resolutions. It doesn't work with a "my way or the highway" attitude around here, you should know that. If you're going to be critical(and downright aggresive and confrontational), but not offer any solutions, it's gonna be pretty damn hard to come up with anything that suits both sides of the argument.

If you would like to begin discussions about a thought process to use when going about deciding whether or not to use the "undo" button, feel free, but that isn't the topic being discussed here. The topic being discussed here is policies to be followed when a potential edit war is going to spark.