Talk:Furtive Pygmy/@comment-87.35.241.2-20180831110240/@comment-67.183.189.53-20190220113615

@Kouzen It isn't that the Age of Dark would be great, it's that the Age of Dark following the Age of Fire (then another Age of Fire followed by another Age of Dark) is the natural order of existence and as is proven in DS3, it's inevitable. Each time the Flame is linked, the Age of Fire resultant from the linking of the Flame grows shorter until a point where there just isn't enough fuel to keep linking the Flame. However, there will always be embers of the First Flame, which will grow increasingly as the Age of Dark progresses and eventually subsides, resulting in the cycle repeating.

The Age of Dark will eventually happen no matter what is done to prevent it, so do you want to continue to defy nature in a futile attempt to keep the Age of Dark at bay, or do you want to restore the natural order of the world which has already been defiled for centuries - if not millennia? THAT is the choice you are presented with and THAT is why there is so much interest in restoring the natural order.