Thread:Matsczon/@comment-6309310-20160707182309/@comment-4511886-20160707224205

A piece of trivia's relevancy isn't regarding its importance, but how relevant it is to the article's topic. That trivia wasn't about Black Iron Tarkus, but rather the Tarkus from Jojo's, which means further reading should be taken on the linked article for Jojo's Tarkus.

Imagine, if you will, an article about George Bush that compares him to George Washington. "They have similar names and were presidents of the US." That is fine (if it's trivia worthy is up for debate, obviously), but then adding on "George Washington played a role in the American Revolution" is not, because the main topic, George Bush, has nothing to do with it, and the latter part should instead be on the article for Washington.

The reason for this is so we don't have to deal with gigantic trains of Trivia that goes on about twenty different topics because they are all indirectly connected to the main topic.