Talk:Licia of Lindeldt/@comment-10518399-20140904021326/@comment-86.21.101.169-20140921194854

I just want to say that I don't think Licia is the Nameless Usurper despite some people's speculations. Their speculation is based on one thing: Licia and the Nameless Usurper wearing the Saint's set which in its description says it belongs to Licia.

Now onto why they're different people:

-Different facial characteristics including different eye colours and different coloured hair. Licia is a brunette with brown eyes whilst the Nameless Usuper has blonde hair and green eyes.

Usurper: http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140901232729/darksouls/images/thumb/9/90/IMG_20140901_192211.jpg/250px-IMG_20140901_192211.jpg

Licia:

http://soulslore.wdfiles.com/local--files/data:licia-of-lindeldt/licia-face.jpg

Comparison together:

-Different attributes. Licia casts miracles whilst the Nameless Usuper doesn't and clearly can't. Why forgo miracles when invading people if you're adept at them?

-If you kill Licia before visting Drangleic castle you are still invaded. In comparison, killing a freed Navlaan means you don't invaded by him. From Software wouldn't make the mistake of Licia invading you if dead if she is indeed the Nameless Usurper.

Licia's guilt can easily be the fact that she cons people not that she's the Nameless Usuper and responsible for invading people's worlds (since that's not an actual sin in the Dark Souls mechanics either).

Also, the Nameless Usurper wearing Licia's Saint's set can mean two things: it's not a unique clothing piece from Licia's land and the Usurper brought/found one or the Usurper killed Licia in their own world for the set.

Alternatively I'm wrong and From Software made a huge error here with the above mistakes. When you were invaded by NPC's in Demon's Souls and Dark Souls, they had the same appearances as their non-phantom counter-parts and the same is even true for Navlaan so I think the Nameless Usurper is not Licia on account of that.