Board Thread:Dark Souls III/@comment-28254659-20160520200039/@comment-25805861-20160524094206

LaVey wrote: DLCs for Dark Souls and Dark Souls II were spectacular, in my opinion. While the one in DS1 reused some environments, at least the new additions, like enemies and bosses, made it more than worth the purchase.

All the three DLCs in Dark Souls II were spectacular! All new content, new enemies, gorgeous environments, great atmosphere, awesome bosses! A 10 out of 10, if you ask me.

Unfortunately, for Dark Souls III I have very low expectations. When I saw all the recycled content they used in the final game, I just got very disappointed. Each enemy is recycled like three or four times, they just were given different skins. Most bosses were either Sif's clones or were the type that just stands up and runs toward you while unleashing a long barrage of attacks, no personality, style or strategy whatsoever. The grayed-washed out colors used in the game were not very appealing to me. And what I hated the most, complete rooms were also reused, they just added different textures to the walls!

Seeing all this recycled content, I can only expect the DLCs for Dark Souls III are going to be more recycled rooms, enemies and Sif's clones, just to cash-in on the franchise's name.

That's sincerely how I feel about them. Sorry. You don't have to sorry. What you said is truth (to some extent), but have hope in DLCs. Dark Souls franchise always deliver good DLCs.