Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-5264386-20141113101121/@comment-5264386-20141114123557

@Lucky: The only reason I removed the comment was because it merely stated they agreed with the concept, as you pointed out. However, the purpose of this thread is to gather suggestions towards building the Code of Conduct, rather than to simply act as a poll for whether one should be implemented. Thus, I removed the comment in order to try and keep the thread focused on providing suggestions, rather than supplying a simple "yes" or "no". Agreement or disagreement is more constructive when reasons are given to support that statement, and suggestions are provided as a result.

I did include that reminder down the bottom in order to try and prevent this from occurring, but it seems that I may need to reword it a little bit to make sure my intentions come across as intended. However, if worse comes to worse and this causes a kerfuffle, I'll just come out and say that I accept full responsibility for the removal of the comment. I'll also remind you that the comment can be undeleted, so it's not the end of the world. Again, I'll stress that the only reason I removed the thread was to keep the thread focused and thus more useful to the policy-making process. On-topic: The general consensus seems to be that the introduction of Forum Moderators would be beneficial for the enforcement of the CoC. I can certainly see why these have been suggested, since there is a lack of active Admins at the moment. However, I just wanted to point out that, as far as I know, Forum Moderators aren't a default Wikia user class. As a result, I suspect either Fingyer or Balagog would have to create the class (though this is only a guess). It's not a big deal if it works out that way, but just wanted to point it out nonetheless.