Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-4511886-20160424085730

Hello wikians! Got some pretty big stuff going on to share with you.

Spoilers in chat
First, and foremost, the thing that some of you have been aching for, and others have been terrified of; the spoiler rule in Chat has officially been lifted.

Note that this does not mean you can just go into chat and spoil without any context, but discussions about DaS3 that contain spoilers are now perfectly fine. To put it simply; don't be that guy that just throw out spoilers for no reason.

Removal of inactive staff
A bit of self-explanatory housekeeping, this one. Basically, inactive staff does not contribute to the wiki in any way. By removing inactive staff, we can avoid users attempting to contact said staff. It also gives us a more accurate representation of how well-staffed the wiki is.

Note that these demotions do not reflect the staff's performance when they were active. Returning users will have the chance to regain their position, if they can prove that they're going to be more active in the future, and the wiki is actually in need of more staff. Also note that some staff that comes in every now and then may still be demoted, as their activity is not deemed consistent enough to warrant a staff position.

For this to take full effect, we need a community consensus on the demotion of the other two Bureaucrats, Fingyer and Balagog gro-Nolob, as Bureaucrats may only be demoted by Wikia staff.

Should Fingyer and Balagog gro-Nolob be demoted due to inactivity? Yes No

Listing reason for demotion
So here's something that is in a bit of a gray area at the moment. The last three staff members to lose their positions have done so due to personal resignation from said position. All of these have been listed with both the reason and date of their demotion, but previous demotions have not been listed.

As such I'm putting up yet another vote: Should the reason for demotions be listed on the staff pages? Yes No  