Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-110.32.195.239-20130628044602/@comment-10407900-20160423220400

167.154.37.78 wrote: Brainwasher5 wrote: Please keep the tone of the conversation civil.

Okay, youre right. Let me be civil in a rephrased response. There are so many other things DS and its lore than can be speculated on that may actually have relevancy within the game and its story. To suggest Havel is Andre implies that either people are stretching way to far for the sake of debate, attempting to rile up post-readers (such as I was when I responded uncivilly), or are genuinely not paying very much attention to the game and its content. Lets assume for the sake of the argument that Havel is in fact Andre...where do we go from there? Is there some special content or lore or direction this revelation leads us too? NO! That certain revelation leads us nowhere but to a new topic. If Havel is actually Havel in that tower, then we can follow the lore provided to us by the game designers. I love Dark Souls and the following and preceding games in the series. I have a genuine interest in connecting the story line and learning of the Dark Souls Lore. When someone posts something as silly as suggesting two people are the same in the case where they clearly aren't, I begin to wonder about the intent. I just cant imagine the designers taking a lot of time to script out dialogue and lore and create lands and NPC's with an insidious plot to have this one guy (Havel) hold so much of a twist....LIKE REALLY? I hope this was civil enough. And I am sorry to those I offended by my earlier post.

Talk about taking the bait. The large bulk of this thread is satirical and the OP was likely a troll or ignorant to DS lore, plain and simple. Stop pedaling your menstrual cycle like you're competing in the Tour De France and move on if you don't find the subject matter amusing.