Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-5632187-20141023222048/@comment-25173123-20141112035236

Cosmicsilver wrote:

As for the rest of your post, Billy, it was completely irrelevant to the topic of this thread, to be honest. This thread is meant to create guidelines for what to do when your edit is undone in bad faith, not to help people know when and when not to use the undo button. Completely different discussions. How was it completely irrelevant? I gave you an example of what happens with rules in place. (though you have changed the first rule slightly to exclude the process of communicating with the person and instead go directly to an Admin? Which is diretly against what you later said about Admin being the last resort?) An undo was made to recent change and communication with person was made and days later the only resolution is to still be waiting for said person to communicate further on the subject? So the so called Edit War was averted but the point is that the correction (or identification of no correction needed) has not presented itself. The 'undo" has entire control of the situation forcing all situations to be handled by Admin now.

I have found myself typing and erasing many many times in trying to reply to your last post. But find myself not being able to do so with any sense of respect or tone. So I just will not.

So keeping this unusually short for one of my replies... enough already.