Talk:Age of Dark/@comment-199.247.128.250-20130509220716/@comment-208.180.203.191-20130718221855

Depends on what you mean by 'speculation.' Most prefer to look at the parts and any connection made that is not purely objective as inadmissable, or people who like to say, for example that 'the Dark' and 'the Abyss' aren't the same because it isn't SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED. Than there are those who look at the whole, as I believe the game was intended, these are those who see 'the Dark and 'the Abyss' as the synonymous because in the games contexts, well... they are synonyms. There's a subjective oversite of material outside dark souls itself when attempting to understand it's lore. For exanple, anyone who knows about Multiverse Theory irl, could easily make the observation that every PC is an otherworld version of him/herself. Meaning everytime you summon, invade or get got, in the objective lore, the Undead Chosen is simply summoning and invading him/her parallel selves. Demons Souls goes as far as to state this in it's lore for the summoning Eye Stones. Most aspects get vastly overlooked because they don't pertain to Dark Souls by Dark Souls, but like using a book to explain the same book is circular logic = Fail. So yeah, depending on your definition of speculation, all theories will be right or all will be wrong. Or if you're a quantum physicist all will be right and wrong simultaneously and neither. Enjoy.