Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-3492791-20140523192544/@comment-25173123-20140806095951

Currently how the policy reads (if you have changed it recently then I haven't identified changes yet.) it makes it so that videos almost have to be hand made for this Wikia or face the wrath of the Delete Ripper. (that person that has been deleting things left and right of late.)

I am a sarcastic fun loving guy. (True, really.) But it feels like the wording of the policy makes it so that if I even try to have any kind of additinal haha moment in my video that I will be smacked on the peepee for it. I mean even read the part about videos basically needing to be starting from a bonfire and then to point B. And videos dealing with sorcery can only show how the sorcery looks. Just so many little tag words that make the policy feel like my dad telling me how to properly mow the lawn. And if I am enjoying myself while mowing the lawn then I am doing it wrong. ha

I am not saying videos have to be entertainment pieces thru and thru, but that to be clinical also is not a requirement. Even CNN and BBC have filler stories so people don't change the channel. ;) Here is a simple example of how I made a video for BF3 when people were having discussion on a certin Achievment and it not working for them. video example per current policy it would be considered textual commentary. I am going to post a video later on some Painted World aspects and allow you a chance to see how it is informative but has elements that would technically be against media policy how it is worded now.

I would have to open up the policy again and browse the verbiage to give you specifics. But food is getting to be my priority right now... as I wrote a novel already it seems on the other comment discussion on media issues. :D

Really starting to not appreciate some users here who are trying to clean the bathtub and throwing the baby out with the bath water. (with a mentality that it isn't his baby so it doesn't matter.)

~Hollow till the day I Live.