Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-5264386-20140810061848/@comment-5632187-20140813012754

Alright, so just going over the majority of the comments:

Most, if not all, people seem to be in favor of utilizing consensus to some extent. I seem to be in the minority with what I'm saying about the whole "give your vote and reasons and move on" thing, and I'm fine with that since I understand why people would be opposed to that.

We all seem to agree that we use consensus for promotions/nominations/whatever you wanna call them. The way to go about discussing other things is, I suppose, another topic for another time.

I don't think we really came to a decsision about what Mats said for restricting those who are voting, so I'd like to hear more opinions on that thought.

Billy I only just saw what you said about needing to have set responsibilities for Admins/Mods/'Crats to follow, and we already have a basis for a code for them to follow that needs to be fleshed out still.

Also, requirements for being nominated, we need to figure that out too.

@Else's suggestion, I believe that's a great suggestion, as it avoids the possibility of a "high school popularity contest" like some people were afraid of, by having the Admins/Mods able to see "Okay, this is what the community thinks, now let's decide." We just have to trust in our current Admins and Mods to make the decisions right for the wiki, and I personally do trust every person who's been appointed Admin/Bureaucrat to do so.

If I missed any points that need to be discussed, tell me and I'll edit this comment.

I think we need to organize what's being said here a little bit, so keeping it to discussing one point at a time may be a good idea for getting all of this sorted out quickly.