Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-5264386-20140810061848/@comment-25173123-20140811212025

Well then you are completely wrong cosmic. (this would be that part where you said not to basically argue with me right?)

If a person is nominated (that in itself would be another persons post) then there has to be an option for people to voice their concerns on a nominated candidate.

I am not saying... we should be able to talk down a persons opinion. I am saying we need to have an option to give our own reasons why such a nominated person would not fit the bill. Not directly to the person nominating another but in direct reference to the nominated person. Not a back and forth or tit for tat, but an opinion on nominated person.

You can't have numerous nominations without a valid voice of concern if warranted. Otherwise you would just have all posative comments without being able to identify a persons potential flaws. Not rocket science. Stop trying to twist it.

And your last part then was irrelevant because it had no association with my comments as I was not talking in ANY general decisions. Again... talk to what I was talking if you are addressing me... otherwise pointless as I already discussed I would not address that here and would only talk promotions per say.

You sure you are a chat moderator already? ;)

Smile son. Your britches don't look happy.

~ Hollow till the day I Live