Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-3492791-20141017005608/@comment-5632187-20141017011053

My understanding has always been that anything humanoid that is given a name (Kirk, Mildred, Maldron, Afflicted Graverobber) is what is defined as a character, though this may not be the best use of the category. The thing is that on the NavBar, we have the dropdown named "Characters", under which we list "Enemies" and "Bosses" which would lead to the assumption that these entities are considered characters. A singular definition and a redesign of the NavBar, if necessary, is what we need to discuss. I feel that the best possible definition of what we should call a character would be this: "Any entity that can be interacted with in a non-hostile way is what is considered a character." This would mean that people such as Vendrick, Gwyndolin, Ancient Dragon(DkSII), and so on would all be considered Characters while Kirk, Maldron, Afflicted Graverobber and so on would not be considered characters. Thoughts?