Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-25173123-20140924083448/@comment-25173123-20140928014030

Neither is actually a true first person view. But a skewed over the shoulder view. But it appears a few edits to the note did in fact try to incororate that wording.

This is how the current wording reads. "Use of the Binoculars is the only way to get a view without the player character appearing on the screen."

It would seem the current contention (other then the actual need to have it) is the absoluteness of the statement itself? In that case you either fix the absoluteness of it or word it so it becomes true.

A fix would simply need to incorporate portions that can't be mimicked by other options.


 * Use of the Binoculars is the only way to get a free moving 360 degree view without the player character or weapon appearing on the screen.


 * Use of the Binoculars is the only way to get a view without the player character or weapon appearing on the screen, while still allowing the player to freely look around.


 * Use of the Binoculars is the only way to get a view without the player character or weapon being on the screen.

Any version of these should be sufficient to meet the truth factor of the statement as the reticle is considered part of the bow and thus eliminates it as a possibility. And the obstruction method does not allow free looking around while attempting it because you will need to keep object in front of character. And the method of object obstruction does not actually remove character from being on screen. Just obstructs it's view. And any thoughts further on that last part is purely semantics at best.

Obviously rewording can be done to clean up the flow of the words as long as it doesn't take away from the meaning and truth of the statement.