Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-10209824-20140321195951/@comment-10209824-20140512175531

Cement Plant wrote: I don't have a (full) theory because I try to make one based on in-game evidence rather than go with "whatever works". And no, you're not presenting evidence: all you do is say things that, for the most part, are completely unconfirmed to be either true or false by the game. In other words, your "theory" only works because of LACK of direct evidence AGAINST it, rather than thanks to abundance of evidence in favor of it, which makes it a crappy one. The very fact that you have the word (full) in parenthesis tells me all I need to know. You can drop it btw, because you clearly have no theory.

You say you try to do it by basing it off of in-game evidence, I've been literally ripping my information from the games to come up with my ideas. All you do is essentially say, "no it isn't", and make these hilariously ignorant statements regarding the lore. This is the same bullshit when you kept saying that the devs never said that Drangleic wasn't Lordran, even though I, and another guy, kept linking the articles. Want prove me wrong, give me your best theory. Otherwise, just give up.